"What is" versus "what ought to be". Is "what is" the fact as seen which can be dealt with and responded to in some way? Is "what ought to be" a picture in the mind and thus a fantasy? Is this fantasy used as a basis of judging "what is" as good, bad, right, wrong, happy, unhappy, et cetera?
Does judging prevent one from responding to "what is?" Does it create struggle, conflict, and resistance to "what is?'
No comments:
Post a Comment